I agree with everybody and nobody!
'Classic tunes' (pieces of music) are in a class all by themselves. Especially if they are being performed by the original artist(s). The crowd kind of expects to hear the number they love so much played the way they remember them.
Creative choices, musical interpretation, personal expression, all are valid and have their place, just not when reproducing a well-loved classic. I love Abe, I think he's a power-house of a drummer, (and a great singer!) but blast-beat bass drum fills in The End? That's just a bad choice on any day.
Classic anything, Beatle tunes especially, should be played the way they were recorded. It's not only what the audience expects, it's what the -material- deserves. As a drummer and a musician I see my job as serving the groove. Whatever the groove is, it is my job to feed it. But when I'm walking in the footsteps of others, out of respect, I will do my best to recreate the part as people remember it and love it. It's not about me, (us) it's about the music. :2Cents:
Bermuda is a perfect example of what I'm talking about. His work with Al has always been to reproduce well-known classic pieces of music so his boss can skat all over them with his own rhymes. Bermuda and the musicians in that band are some of the most talented pro's I've ever heard. Bermuda manages to infuse the playing with his own style while remaining true to the original intention and integrity of the piece he's reproducing. That's f'n hard to do. Anybody who has heard an Al Yankovic video knows what I mean. If Bermuda took liberties, it would ruin the mood and the setting and it just wouldn't sound right.
Classics are classics, you don't want to futz with them too much. Pi$$es people off. Kellyj is right to be offended. Altering the piece is almost disrespectful to the music in a strange way.
John