[COLOR="DarkRed"]Just a couple of quick comments here....before you go on trashing the person who re-wrapped this kit (me)...consider whether you are upset about that (my work) ....or about how the seller represented the kit.
First off....the extra (original) holes were left there at the client's request, in case sometime in the future someone chose to re-install period-proper Rogers hardware. Secondly...all of the drums I renovate I tune LOW....so at some point I am figuring some of those t-rods got moved around or came from elsewhere. Because according to your description, there's no way those rods could have been on those heads tuned low if the rods were so short. Third....I don't use lock washers as rod washers. Next...unless specified by the client, I don't necessarily go with period or mfr-specific t-rods on toms or snares. I certainly don't worry about mfr-specific washers. I rarely ever do that, and I inform buyers of that...because I think that's a bit whacked for a re-wrapped kit, made up of orphan shells, IMHO. Lastly.......no, the brads of the badges are not original...BUT...Rogers bent their brads, too. They didn't cut 'em off......
So....yeah, I agree...the kit was damaged in shipping. And I agree....the seller did a poor job of representing the kit.
Basically this was a set of orphan shells re-wrapped in champagne sparkle and outfitted with Rogers hardware, and miscellaneous t-rods. Never was intended to be anything but. Never was it sold to my client as anything but. The kits I do aren't intended to be re-creations or even historically accurate renovations w/ all original parts down to the tee. They are intended to give good ol' drums which are still in solid structural condition a second life. And they are always represented and priced such. I leave the 100% original fittings to those who wanna charge $3000 for their work. That's not my clientele.....
Now, here's a word of advice : I disagree that YOU should file the damage claim with UPS. When I am a seller, if something like that happens I never put the onus to file a claim on the recipient. As a seller it was my responsibility to get the kit to the buyer in the same shape as it left me...it's not the recipient's responsibility to jump through hoops (which UPS has a significant number of, BTW) to file a claim.
Just return the kit and get your $ back. It doesn't sound like that will be all that difficult.
But I just wanna clarify that when one goes casting aspersions on others work on a public forum....one should probably consider whether or not the intent of the work was to create a historically accurate kit.... to the tee...in the first place....
....or just to get a working kit which looks great, sounds good, and functions the way a drum set should. That's all the deal on this set ever was.....
[/COLOR]