Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
Processing Attachment, Gallery - 133.06889%

Zildjian Hollow Logo

Loading...

From Chromeo

Great Scott! Sorry if that sounded a bit like something Captain Kirk would say. :D Couldn't resist.I'm seeing those stamps you posted above. My 18" Flat Ride (hollow logo) has this stamps. The 20" however has the 60's stamp. Have a look at the photos.Cheers.

Wow, look at that! Those 2 things just don't go together at least from the samples that I own and have seen. :) Sure looks like time travel was somehow involved....

Here's the hollow logo stamp on the 16" that I have.

[IMG]http://i802.photobucket.com/albums/yy309/HerronScott/Zildjian%20Cymbals/100_1019.jpg[/IMG]

Scott

Posted on 10 years ago
#11
Guest
Loading...

Great, thanks Chromeo. Yes that stamp on your 20" would pass as a 60s stamp based on the ZILDJIAN Co criterion and the vertical alignment criterion. The anomalies do come up from time to time. The only problem is that we have no idea how frequently the apparent anomalies appear. 1 per 100 cymbals? 10 per 100 cymbals? At what point do we stop thinking of them as anomalies and decide that they represent the true variation out there in cymbal-land?

Can you please measure the total height of that stamp. I'm looking to pin down if it is 1 3/16" (30 mm) or 1.5" (38 mm) or some other height. So the measurement needs to be reasonably accurate.

Also, was yours originally sold in the UK (or European?) market? If you know that is.

The lathing (particularly the way it goes up on the bell, and the relatively even nature of the tonal grooves, and the visible top hammering fit within the normal range of such things seen in the later 60s or early 70s, but this too is very poorly defined territory. I haven't yet been able to ascertain just what people mean when they speak about lathing differences between eras. Drumaholic must know (since he created all of this stamp study) but I don't know yet. Maybe he will help us out in our discussion.

Posted on 10 years ago
#12
Posts: 1344 Threads: 172
Loading...

From zenstat

Can you please measure the total height of that stamp. I'm looking to pin down if it is 1 3/16" (30 mm) or 1.5" (38 mm) or some other height. So the measurement needs to be reasonably accurate.Also, was yours originally sold in the UK (or European?) market? If you know that is.

Zenstat, I can confirm the height of the stamp to be approximately 30 mm. The stamp is roughly midway between the edge of the cymbal and where where the bell meets the "bow"? The edge of the bell. The stamp itself seems a little askew. It doesn't run perpendicular to the cymbal edge. I don't know if that's common enough, but thought I'd mention it anyway.

I bought the cymbal in a music store here in Ireland. They had a few second hand cymbals. That's all I know about it. I use it as a 20" crash from time to time because it's very crash-able and I prefer Istanbul ride cymbals. :D But this Avedis is a fabulous cymbal. That classic Zildjian sound.D' Drummer

Posted on 10 years ago
#13
Guest
Loading...

From Chromeo

Zenstat, I can confirm the height of the stamp to be approximately 30 mm. The stamp is roughly midway between the edge of the cymbal and where where the bell meets the "bow"? The edge of the bell. The stamp itself seems a little askew. It doesn't run perpendicular to the cymbal edge. I don't know if that's common enough, but thought I'd mention it anyway. I bought the cymbal in a music store here in Ireland. They had a few second hand cymbals. That's all I know about it. I use it as a 20" crash from time to time because it's very crash-able and I prefer Istanbul ride cymbals. :D But this Avedis is a fabulous cymbal. That classic Zildjian sound.D' Drummer

As it happens I have a pair of 14" New Beats with that stamp and positioning and the defect of being a little askew. Plus another bottom hat where the rolling on of the die stamp was straight on as we expect.

According to Drumaholic the 30mm is the "early 60s trademark". But as I said before, he may know of that 30mm one making a comeback later on (in the later 1970s). I've been trying to get consensus dates for the appearance of the hollow ink Zildjian and later changes. The timetable at present goes

[LIST]

[*]1978 hollow ink Zildjian underneath

[*]1983 solid ink Zildjian top and bottom (no Avedis)

[*]1994 word Avedis added above and to left of Zildjian on top side of cymbal

[*]1994 laser serial numbers

[/LIST]

But this is certainly preliminary. In particular I don't know whether the word Avedis was added and then later the same year laser serials went on, or if you can expect all cymbals which say Avedis Zildjian on the top to have laser serials. Plus all years tend to come with a bit of uncertainty (plus or minus a year). Things aren't as exact and simple as they seem when you see them written down in black and white.

But any way you look at it, a hollow ink Zildjian logo on a cymbal with that stamp is an interesting and unexpected combination. Thanks for sharing.

Posted on 10 years ago
#14
Posts: 6170 Threads: 255
Loading...

here's yet another one zen...hollow ink logo and three dot stamp....

[ame]http://www.ebay.com/itm/Zildjian-15-Bottom-Hi-Hat-1587g-Hollow-Block-Logo-3-dot-stamp-/271536387656?pt=Vintgae_Drums_Percussion&hash=item3f38d47648[/ame]

mike

Posted on 10 years ago
#15
Guest
Loading...

Thanks Mike. So now what, he wonders aloud? Different starting date for the hollow ink Zildjian? Reuse of the 60s logo towards the end of the 70s or later? Somebody sneaking around and inking hollow Zildjians on the bottom of 60s cymbals to give us a hard time?

There are also definitely 70s looking stamps with the hollow ink logo as well:

[ame]http://www.ebay.com/itm/VINTAGE-1970s-14-ZILDJIAN-NEW-BEAT-HI-HAT-CYMBALS-HOLLOW-LOGO-EXCELLENT/400702750874?_trksid=p2047675.c100005.m1851&_trkparms=aid%3D222007%26algo%3DSIC.MBE%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D20131003132420%26meid%3D8139905096872988838%26pid%3D100005%26prg%3D20131003132420%26rk%3D1%26rkt%3D6%26sd%3D271536387656&rt=nc[/ame]

Same model in ink on this one as the 15" above. Says

BOTTOM NEW BEAT

HI HAT

(and is found on both tops and bottoms)

This is different from my reputed earlier one (with an early 60s stamp) where the ink says

HI HAT BOTTOM

NEW BEAT

which is supposed to be only on the bottom hat.

Posted on 10 years ago
#16
Posts: 6170 Threads: 255
Loading...

I think the start date on the hollows is pretty close. I have quite a few hollow ink logos. I need to check the stamps. I do know that several,at least, have the 70's stamp.

mike

Posted on 10 years ago
#17
Posts: 6170 Threads: 255
Loading...

and another..

[ame]http://www.ebay.com/itm/Zildjian-22-034-Hollow-Logo-Ride-Cymbal-/181386300218?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item2a3b774b3a&nma=true&si=%252Bi%252Fi%252BTDxB8YJjlbS3TAkgCLNHB0%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557[/ame]

mike

Posted on 10 years ago
#18
Guest
Loading...

Thanks again Mike.

I've just never looked before. So these don't surprise me. I've asked a few times if anybody has really paid close attention to the mid 70s to 1994 (advent of laser serials with years encoded). If Drumaholic has, he has not yet answered my query. So I don't know if we are noticing things which are already known but unpublished. That would be unnecessary duplication due to keeping results unpublished out of the fear that they might be stolen without giving Drumaholic his due credit. And that's a valid fear given the number of people (and web sites) which have done just that.

The potential issue with these cymbals is that once the hollow ink Zildjian underneath is polished away they would look like early 60s cymbals and who would know the difference? I hear there are differences in bell size and shape, and differences in lathing. But these are anecdotal. There aren't any well documented details on just what these differences are. So now we seem to be back to the state of not being able to tell the difference between some early 60s cymbals and some late 70s cymbals on the basis of the pressed in die stamp, and no reliable info on what the other diagnostic differences might be. And we don't know what proportion of cymbals this might be.

Maybe most people don't care about telling these eras apart because they believe that Avedis Zildjian was producing cymbals they are not interested in after the mid 1960s (or whenever). I've always felt that Avedis Zildjian cymbals which are post the mid 60s era haven't had the same effort lavished on documenting and dating them which early ones (50s and earlier) have. But maybe they have, and I just don't know about the results.

Posted on 10 years ago
#19
Posts: 6170 Threads: 255
Loading...

I will say this zen..most that I have talked with about 70's-80's cymbals have always raved about the hollow ink models,including me. I see no way that they could be older cymbals that were sold later with ink on the underside. they would have hve needed tons of old stock to be able to do this. I agree with you completely about the logos being gone and making it impossible to date at that point. I have several in which you can barely see the logo.

mike

Posted on 10 years ago
#20
  • Share
  • Report
Action Another action Something else here