OK, the shells without the re-rings does date them as later in the lifecycle. I have a feeling that we may be looking at solving a mystery, or atleast finding another piece of the puzzle that is the MIJ stencils. If these are from the Hoshino group, then we have gotten closer to identifying a timeline for the split of the makers. This has been a thorn for us and is driving us mad! You see, at the time of some of these changes, there seems to be an "exit" from the market, and a lapse from the time Star came to be known as TAMA. And now I am getting a distinct feeling they may have operated under the Hoshino name during the re-alignment just prior to intrducing TAMA as the new kid on the block. So that would make a lot of sense because we are certain there has been some apparent duplication of hardware at times and from an unknown player. Does this begin to sound more like the real deal?
Now I think I am figuring out the way it went down. Hoshino "took over" the manufacturing of the Star line up of stencils as the company prepared to launch TAMA. This makes much more sense than an actual unknown third player because the Hoshino stuff we associate with Hoshino is typically the later, newer more modern hardware, and the Star stuff as the venerable old lovely Slingerland and Grestch copies. The reason they were able to keep copying Slingerland is because Bud was the only one too cheap to sue them, and when CBS bought him out, that is when the lawsuits started and Star could no longer import stuff using the copied hardware, in the early 70s!!! I got it!!! This is it. This is how it went down, Star got sued by CBS,and tanked/bankrupted Star, the company, spinning off Hoshino group, changing the style of the hardware and re-inventing itself to launch TAMA, all the while selling Hoshino to KAWAI in order to finance the new undertaking, and possibly to end the lawsuit. Can anyone else take the time to check and see iof the lawsuits are time correct for this? I think I just figured uit out.,