I am also interested in Starclassic drums but I really do not understand the line. I see used kits on the market with prices that range from 600-700 up to the mid 2000's. There are birch, maple and bubinga iterations and it appears that birch kits resell cheaper. There are also discrepancies in the isolation mounting systems. Regardless, it seems odd to me that very similar kits in similar condition sell for such disparate ranges. Anyone have additional insight? That would help the OP and myself. By the way, that sounds like a pretty great deal, but I will be very interested to see if anyone has additional input.
Tama has upgraded their iso mounts,from time to time,so there will be some discrepencies.The same with all of their lugs and hardware,and drum pedals.
Birch shelled Starclassic performer kits,sold for less money,which is why they're cheaper that maple or birch /bubinga.There also seems to be a drum company fueled ,higher demand for maple shelled drums,since that's what kind of drum fashion these days.
Also,The Japanese made Starclassic drums,are more desireable,than their later import cousins.Are they better...nope.It's just perception.
Look on other drum forums,and thay hate on the new Ludwig Signet 105's.Other drum forums,love them,with certain pro's giging,and probably recording with them already.
Sorry,I didn't want to get too far afield,but my point is,perception governs a lot of how we see drums made in certain places,from different materials,with a good portion of it......unfounded.
BTW..that's a very good price,they're great drums.
Steve B