Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
Processing Attachment, Gallery - 176.15866%

"Questionable" Gladstone Sighting

Loading...

This post will probably be deleted as it references an item on eBay. I question this VDF policy as I would assume members would be actively interested in the current vintage drum market and what better source than eBay? OK the generic “Ludwig Supraphonic” (do you have any idea how many of these are out there?) listing would be redundant, but my post for a brush collection that I built over 30 years was deleted.

But I digress…until this is deleted, buyer beware, http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=130483498530&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT

A) This is not a Gretsch Gladstone, it is simply a Gretsch…a very rare early Max Roach Gretsch, but a Gretsch.

B) They are not “Gladstone” lugs but pre “Stream-Lined Castings.” I made the mistake of including in my a description of the early Max Roach snare lug “Like Gretsch-Gladstone lugs the lugs had a single nodal post” in the Gretsch book. If I had a dime for every time I have seen them called “Gretsch Gladstone lugs” since, I’d be a rich man. The designer of these “single nodal tube lugs,” Bill Hagner (who worked at the Gretsch factory when this drum was introduced) told me “I had to buy a screw machine part (tube) to make that lug. It was the same post that we used for the snare butt for the early Micro Sensitive…it got too damn expensive…we readily switched over to the (smaller version) Streamed-Lined casings (1954).

C) They are not ‘single flange’ hoops as the buyer believes, but early double flange die cast Gretsch rims as he correctly later identifies as ‘Stick Chopper” rims.

D) The missing Gretsch badge is not a big thing, but if a badge is added, for it to be period correct, a Gretsch badge from the 40’s/early 50’s badge is necessary. Significant difference is, the drumsticks on the earlier badges are thinner than the 60’s style we see so often on eBay (ops, I said that word again).

E) The “two very small holes” the seller references would indeed be for the “Max Roach” badge (as seen on pages 42 and 84 of my book).

F) The Frank’s Drum Shop decal is way cool.

G) “I do not believe this is the original snare strainer.” Yeah, I guess the four hole bolt pattern extra holes behind the Ludwig post 1929 model 338 strainer might lead one to think so. The correct throw would be the Gretsch “Feather Touch Strainer” that coincidently appears on eBay (darn, again).

H) Since the bottom rim covers the butt, one cannot determine if it is original, but what appears in the photo looks to be a later “bar clamp, two bolt” style (he also says the two mounting screws “do not match the period of this drum.” The early Max Roach snare was fitted with a “5381 back grip,” a single nodal (not Gladstone) post.

I) “can't tell what those rims are made of or if they were ever intended to be shiny” Gretsch used “pot metal” for their die cast rims and as we all know, did not hold chrome well. Yes they were meant to be shiny (read chrome plated).

J) Not mentioned in the description but before anyone who tries to identify the tension rods as Gladstone or Gretsch Gladstone, it appears there are two thick tension rod washers in place making the rod resemble a Gladstone rod.

Now I am not faulting anyone for glorifying an item description in their eWord (better?) description. I am certainly as guilty as anyone else for “selling the sizzle” but this seems to me to be a blatant misrepresentation. Thus it seems that eBay (WTF) items that some poor VFD soul would cough up their hard earned cash for should be ID. There’s my 2₵.

Posted on 14 years ago
#1
Loading...

Chet,

Good to see your post and hear from you here on this forum! This drum definitely has caught my interest because it has some similarities to a drum that I purchased recently. I bought a Gladstone lug / Max Roach Peacock Sparkle finish snare from Steve Maxwell.

The snare had some extra holes and the finish was faded but it is a cool example of what I think was an early Max Roach snare in a finish that I really would like to own. Maybe you could offer your opinion or insight as to what I think it was/ is.

To begin it was 4X14 3 ply shell with a clear interior and a date stamp of Sept 19?, 1952. From what I can tell the snare originally came with the renown strainer and the 2 point butt that this snare has. It appears that the snare drum you pointed out has the same type holes that this peacock snare does/ did. 4 large holes where the original strainer was attached.

The 2 point had been replaced with a 4 point butt that did not look right on a 4" shell. The Renown strainer was replaced with a microsensitve but it looks like the owner must have originally drilled the pattern a little to low and changed the height position so there are 3 extra holes for the micro (6 all together) and the 4 original holes for the renown.

There was no Max Roach plate but you can see the 2 tiny holes where it was and the finish at this portion of the drum looks real nice with the green & pink sparkles present.

I thought that this drum in the auction & my drum might have been an early Max Roach before they came out with the microsensitve. Would that be true?

BTW I recently picked up a 6 ply peacock 22" bass drum w/o any fade and am looking for a floor tom & a tom tom now!

Thanks

Mike

looks like

Posted on 14 years ago
#2
Loading...

Chet, great to hear from you , and great history lesson, mike I remember you getting the drum. looking forward to the end results!!Yes SirCool1

Your drummers not much good is he!? What you need is someone that's as good as me. ! John Henry Bonham !!
Posted on 14 years ago
#3
Loading...

A few pictures from the listing so they will be available for future readers.

Chet - Thanks for your insight and education.

Collecting information about the following for ongoing research projects:
Gretsch drums with serial numbers,
Ludwig Keystone and B/O badge drums with serial numbers and date stamps,
Ludwig Standards from 1968-73, and
Ludwigs with paper labels from 1971-72
www.GretschDrumDatingGuide.com
Posted on 14 years ago
#4
Loading...

From cfalzerano

This post will probably be deleted as it references an item on eBay. I question this VDF policy as I would assume members would be actively interested in the current vintage drum market and what better source than eBay?

No reason for this post to be deleted as it's loaded with tons of great information -- that can be used to start decerning the differences between something worth buying and something that might need to be passed on.

Most of the eBay posts are deleted due to the fact of a finite time element and that generally no useful information is included in the thread... the auction runs out and there is a true lack of refenrence to members at a later date.

Posting the pictures and prices (and I've slapped a few of those details into threads) from the auction adds some value to the forum as it aids historical context and helps folks understand the fluxuating value in the market.

Thanks to cfalzerano for posting the deatiled information, and to KCDrumDad for slapping the pics in here!

Posted on 14 years ago
#5
Loading...

Hoppy is quite correct as a PM was sent to Chet BEFORE this post was even up informing him that no, the "Questionable Gladstone" post/thread will NOT be deleted as it is INFORMATIONAL/EDUCATIONAL. It's the typically useless eBay blather posts that serve no purpose.. thus .. they are deleted. Carry on men!

Tommyp/SM

Posted on 14 years ago
#6
Posts: 5176 Threads: 188
Loading...

"This post will probably be deleted as it references an item on eBay. I question this VDF policy..."

Geez, what a way to start an otherwise interesting topic.

"God is dead." -Nietzsche

"Nietzsche is dead." -God
Posted on 14 years ago
#7
Loading...

From MikeJtone

Chet,Good to see your post and hear from you here on this forum! This drum definitely has caught my interest because it has some similarities to a drum that I purchased recently. I bought a Gladstone lug / Max Roach Peacock Sparkle finish snare from Steve Maxwell. The snare had some extra holes and the finish was faded but it is a cool example of what I think was an early Max Roach snare in a finish that I really would like to own. Maybe you could offer your opinion or insight as to what I think it was/ is. To begin it was 4X14 3 ply shell with a clear interior and a date stamp of Sept 19?, 1952. From what I can tell the snare originally came with the renown strainer and the 2 point butt that this snare has. It appears that the snare drum you pointed out has the same type holes that this peacock snare does/ did. 4 large holes where the original strainer was attached.The 2 point had been replaced with a 4 point butt that did not look right on a 4" shell. The Renown strainer was replaced with a microsensitve but it looks like the owner must have originally drilled the pattern a little to low and changed the height position so there are 3 extra holes for the micro (6 all together) and the 4 original holes for the renown. There was no Max Roach plate but you can see the 2 tiny holes where it was and the finish at this portion of the drum looks real nice with the green & pink sparkles present.I thought that this drum in the auction & my drum might have been an early Max Roach before they came out with the microsensitve. Would that be true?BTW I recently picked up a 6 ply peacock 22" bass drum w/o any fade and am looking for a floor tom & a tom tom now!Thanks Mike looks like

Hey Mike

Thanks...couldn't resist posting something on this "questionable" (read misleading) eBay post. My thoughts on your response?

AAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THEY ARE NOT GLADSTONE LUGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh sorry, got kinda excited there...breath deep. OK it may look like a duck but it doesn't quack like a duck ergo (therefore) it is NOT a duck. For it to be a Gladstone lug, it must, at some time or another, have been attached to Gladstone or a Gretsch Gladstone drum. It is indeed a single nodal post tube lug, which have been hanging on the side of drums long before William D. “Billy” Gladstone jumped into the forum (no, not the VDF). In fact, as John Aldridge notes in his wonderful book Guide to Vintage Drums (did I mention I wrote a couple of chapters for him?) on page 15[Attachment: 25543] “As early as 1883 (note, nine years before Gladstone was born), Emile Boulanger was thinking way ahead of his time. Producing drums for the Duplex Drum Company, Boulanger actually had a patent for a double tension, single post, tube lug snare drum.” Gretsch, in fact pictured a 1909 (five years after Gladstone arrived in the United states at age 14) single nodal post snare in their 1954 catalogue.[Attachment: 25544] Gladstone’s use of a single nodal post was therefore not new. Every single nodal post lug is also therefore not a Gladstone lug.

OK, now that we have our terminology correct (yes I have Mafia connections in the United Stated and one more mention of a non Gladstone lug…) here’s my thoughts on your drum.

WHAT A BEAUTY!!! First time I have ever seen one in this fantastic color. Not your usual, run of the mill caddy green, white oriental pearl, black nitron Max Roach, that’s for sure. You couldn’t go wrong with Steve. Totally reputable…TOTALLY. Not to say he doesn’t sell the sizzle. Most of us are guilty of that. But I have never known Steve to misrepresent a drum.

As to specifics, yes the Renown, or “Feather Touch Strainer” was standard equipment on early Max Roach tube lug drums. Some equipped with a “guard” encasing (protecting) the throw off. These were soon replaced with the Micro Sensitive throw. The drum quickly morphed to include the (smaller version) Streamed-Lined casings.

I assume from your post that there is no evidence of the single post “5381 back grip,” correct? If so, I have learned something new as it has been my experience that the Early Max Roaches were equipped as such. Bill Hagner verified that as well. Well, we have all learned that nothing is etched in stone when it comes to vintage drums.

As to all the holes…anyone that does this to a drum should be stoned…I mean literally stoned with rocks…big rocks. Maybe they were stoned when they did this. Once again the old adage…measure it again and when you are through, measure it once more. Personally, I’d reattach a Renown. There’s one up for sale on eBay http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=200573104086&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT (c’mon guys, let Mike have this) and save the micro for a future project (heaven knows you will need to replace this ****ty strainer again). The Renown would probably hide the extra holes. I’d also replace the butt as it is positioned too high and looks totally out of place.

Pity the Max Roach plate is missing but oh well, “T’is what it t’is.” Besides the non-fade pearl placement verifies its original inclusion.

Complimenti (my compliments)!

Best

Chet

2 attachments
Posted on 14 years ago
#8
Loading...

From Hoppy

No reason for this post to be deleted as it's loaded with tons of great information -- that can be used to start decerning the differences between something worth buying and something that might need to be passed on. Most of the eBay posts are deleted due to the fact of a finite time element and that generally no useful information is included in the thread... the auction runs out and there is a true lack of refenrence to members at a later date.Posting the pictures and prices (and I've slapped a few of those details into threads) from the auction adds some value to the forum as it aids historical context and helps folks understand the fluxuating value in the market.Thanks to cfalzerano for posting the deatiled information, and to KCDrumDad for slapping the pics in here!

Ciao Hoppy

As Tommyp aptly pointed out, my accusation that my “eBay Brushes” post was deleted was once more evidence of my guilt of indulging in “foot in mouth.” The post was renamed and moved to the “For Sale” section. And yes thanks KCDrumDad for posting the pics. I am, however, NOT saying this drum should be passed on. I, in fact, have it on my "watch list." It is a totally cool drum but is not what it is purported to be.

Posted on 14 years ago
#9
Loading...

From Tommyp

Hoppy is quite correct as a PM was sent to Chet BEFORE this post was even up informing him that no, the "Questionable Gladstone" post/thread will NOT be deleted as it is INFORMATIONAL/EDUCATIONAL. It's the typically useless eBay blather posts that serve no purpose.. thus .. they are deleted. Carry on men!Tommyp/SM

Aye, Aye Sir. I stand corrected.

Posted on 14 years ago
#10
  • Share
  • Report
Action Another action Something else here