In a totally hands on workshop like K. Zildjian was the intended diameter of a cymbal would be determined by the size of the ingot + how much it was milled. The milled plates ,derived from those ingots, which would be more or less 375mm (their version of 15") when done, were also stacked in order to receive the bell impression. This would cause a progression of bell depth .Flatter, shallower bells would be on the bottom of the stack. K's have bells anywhere from flat to pointed.. Deeper bells would account for a narrower cymbal----probably as much as 1/4" or more. This is one of the reasons that older K's are so inconsistent in diameters and seldom hit the inch size target that is expected but it is my understanding that you measure a straight line across the bottom. A 15" K. would be expected to be a bit shy anyway , by about 1/4".
There is an additional issue, especially when it comes to extremely thin cymbals. A cymbal during hammering is much more likely to exhibit small cracks at the edge than elsewhere. A solution for an edge crack would be to trim that off at the time the cymbal was dressed on the lathe. So a 375mm cymbal becomes a 370mm cymbal----still within bounds for a 15" in the maker's book. If the crack is a big one , then you've got a 14" cymbal now. Who's to know and the work isn't wasted.