Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
Processing Attachment, Gallery - 128.45929%

Mahogany to Maple

Loading...

Does anyone know why WFL switched from Mahogany to Maple when the company became Ludwig? Was maple cheaper to obtain?

Posted on 15 years ago
#1
Posts: 5173 Threads: 188
Loading...

That's very likely the case, in my opinion.

"God is dead." -Nietzsche

"Nietzsche is dead." -God
Posted on 15 years ago
#2
Loading...

Are you talking about just the inner ply? Because if I'm not mistaken, the shell composition, even up until the mid 70s, utilized mahogany. I believe the drums usually had mahogany on the outer ply - the ply directly under the wrap. I believe the construction from inside out was maple rings, maple inner ply, poplar middle ply, mahogany outer ply. I could be wrong. Also, I believe all of Ludwig's rules had exceptions at the time.

Posted on 15 years ago
#3
Posts: 3972 Threads: 180
Loading...

There were several reasons as to "why" the shift away from African Mahogany. The availability was reduced somewhat by the early 60's and flat out phased out by the 70's. Among the factors listed were politics, pricing, ecology, human rights, and changes in music. I'm sure there were other factors, but these are the ones that I've researched.

Posted on 15 years ago
#4
Loading...

My 1970 kit had maple/poplar/maple. It was stained "dark maple".

Posted on 15 years ago
#5
Loading...

Very interesting. Thanks for the input.

Posted on 15 years ago
#6
  • Share
  • Report
Action Another action Something else here