Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
Processing Attachment, Gallery - 169.34447%

Let's clear up Ludwig "Classic" vs. "Super Classic" terms! Last viewed: 20 seconds ago

Loading...

Hello all,

I've come across this time and time again and hope to set the record straight regarding the use of Ludwig's "Classic" and "Super Classic" terms. What finally prompted this is a sale of a nice Downbeat kit on eBay, being called the "Super Classic Downbeat kit"! The term "Classic" is used to identify Ludwig's top-of-the-line shells in the 60's and 70's and even later, that we are all familiar with. The term "Super Classic" denotes a specific, and readily identifiable, cataloged kit, consisting of 9x13, 16x16 and 14x22 shell sizes. One of the most famous cataloged kits of all time! Ludwig also came out with the "Deluxe Classic" outfit in the 70's, which was identical to the "Super Classic" with the exception of no bass drum mounted bracket for the cymbal "L" arm.

Anyway, I just wanted to interject my 2 cents on this subject, as I'm constantly seeing these terms miss-used on other forums and eBay. Please feel free to add your knowledge to this topic!

Posted on 14 years ago
#1
Loading...

Ludwig still uses the term "Classic" for one of its current lines. THAT'S where it gets confusing to a lot of people. They buy a new "Classic" kit, hear the term "Super Classic" somewhere along the way, and BOOM!: their kit is now referred to as a Super Classic. I won't even get into the whole "vintage" nomenclature debacle that prevails. (gotta love those vintage keystone badge Ludwig Super Classics--you know, the ones from the 90s?)

Definitely a sore subject for the few of us out there who actually care...

1970 Ludwig Downbeat
1965 Ludwig Hollywood
1970 Ludwig Jazzette
Posted on 14 years ago
#2
Loading...

Thanks for your information! I definitely don't want this to be a "sore" subject in any way. I just wanted to clear up the confusion in regards to more of the vintage Ludwig offerings, from around the 60's and 70's. Of course, heated debates are what brings more fun and knowledge to the forums!

Posted on 14 years ago
#3
Posts: 2212 Threads: 95
Loading...

So, I have a 67 kit in those sizes with no shell mounted cymbal mount, Deluxe Classic?

Posted on 14 years ago
#4
Loading...

From lucky

So, I have a 67 kit in those sizes with no shell mounted cymbal mount, Deluxe Classic?

Yes, and the fact they had different hardware packages, one of which included Hercules....

"Ignorance may be overcome through education. Stupidity, however, is a lifelong endeavor." So, educate me, I don't likes bein' ignant...
"I enjoy restoring 60s Japanese "stencil" drums...I can actually afford them..."I rescue the worst of the old valueless drums for disadvantaged Children and gladly accept donations of parts, pieces and orphans, No cockroaches, please...
http://www.youtube.com/user/karstenboy
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Coffee...16613138379603
Posted on 14 years ago
#5
Posts: 5176 Threads: 188
Loading...

From lucky

So, I have a 67 kit in those sizes with no shell mounted cymbal mount, Deluxe Classic?

Technically, no. However, this is an interesting one! Here's why:

In the 1967 catalog, there was no "Deluxe Classic" kit listed -only the "Super Classic"...and then there are some gaps in the years that catalogs/flyers were printed...until in 1970-71 the catalog indeed depicts the new Deluxe Classic configuration. It shows a bass drum sans the cymbal mount. The bass drum indeed has the curved retractible spurs...and shows an Atlas snare stand and an Atlas ("Big Beat") hi-hat stand...

...but here's where it gets kinky...

In that catalog, the description states that the hardware package of the Deluxe Classic is the new Atlas line...but the illustration of the Deluxe Classic shows the cymbal stands as being the old 1400 flat base series and not the Atlas cymbal stands! So, if you were to go only by the catalog, the proper Deluxe Classic of that era should have flat base cymbal stands! What's "weird" is that the Atlas cymbal stands WERE available in 1970!!

So, what gives, you ask?

My suspicion is that there were no Atlas cymbal stands available at the time of the photo shoot for the 1970 catalog -which was likely shot the preceeding year (1969). I think the cymbal stands showed up on the scene a few months after the picture was taken. That's my guess. I back this up with the fact that I have a completely original 1969 Jazzette kit and it's hardware package includes an Atlas hi-hat stand and snare stand, but the cymbal stands are flat base. The Atlas stuff was just coming out of the oven at that time!

The question remains in limbo as to the proper way to describe a 1970 Deluxe Classic kit - flat base stands or not? Hmmmm.....x-mas3

"God is dead." -Nietzsche

"Nietzsche is dead." -God
Posted on 14 years ago
#6
Loading...

Here's a fresh oppossum for the gumbo.

Classic refers to the lugs and Super Classic refers to the snare.

Whittle that little tangle down.

What Would You Do
Posted on 14 years ago
#7
Loading...

From RogerSling

Here's a fresh oppossum for the gumbo. Classic refers to the lugs and Super Classic refers to the snare. Whittle that little tangle down.

This is turning out to offer up lots of good ideas! Yes, RogerSling, your reference to Classic lugs and Super Classic snare also holds true! My specific post had to do with calling vintage kits with the "Classic" or "Super Classic" moniker. A quick look at vintage Ludwig catalogs mentions the toms and bass drums as "Classic". which is my whole point.

O-Lugs! As usually, excellent commentary on the whole Atlas hardware thing! I've always noted the same thing about the particular kit that shows Atlas hardware, but also shows the flat-base stands, too! And, yes, there are large year gaps in when catalogs were published, totally adding to what was offered as a catalog kit.

My thanks to everyone contributing to this!

Posted on 14 years ago
#8
Loading...

The terms Super Classic were used variously for various sets and drums. So it is easy to see why some may misname them such. For instance, the Super Classic in the 80s were the ones with 4 ply shells and lacquer finish. So this is a bunch of details that one, if so inclined, could sort out. Have fun with that.

Posted on 14 years ago
#9
Guest
Loading...

From Pounder

The terms Super Classic were used variously for various sets and drums. So it is easy to see why some may misname them such. For instance, the Super Classic in the 80s were the ones with 4 ply shells and lacquer finish. So this is a bunch of details that one, if so inclined, could sort out. Have fun with that.

I was just going to throw the shell construction names into the mix as well. The 6 ply maple shells which Ludwig changed to in 1976 were called "Classic", and in 1988 there were thinner shells called "Super Classic" in 4 ply. And just when you think you are getting a handle on this terminology, how about the LS558 snare which is 3.5x14 and called a "Super Classic Piccolo". How many plies? 5. :confused:

Ludwig: creators of exceptional exceptions.

Posted on 14 years ago
#10
  • Share
  • Report
Action Another action Something else here