Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
Processing Attachment, Gallery - 133.26931%

Zildjian K Istanbul 12" Questions...

Loading...

Cheers for the advice, but that's kind of a bummer as I was hoping to pair this one up for some hats... I don't really use splashes, so not too sure what to do with this now!

Posted on 8 years ago
#11
Loading...

As to drilling, I don't think that I'll go down that route on either the 12 or 13. Both of them may end up for sale, not sure yet...

Posted on 8 years ago
#12
Posts: 85 Threads: 25
Loading...

New stamp 1967/1976

60s Gretsch RB 20/12/14 Burgundy Sparkle
60s Gretsch RB 18/12/14 Silver Glitter
60s Gretsch RB bass drum 16x12 Silver Glitter
60s Gretsch RB COB 4160
60s Rogers Holiday 14x5'5 in Steel Gray Ripple
50s Gretsch RB 14x5'5 MBP
39/41 Gretsch Gladstone 3-Way Tension 14x6'5 Dark Mahogany finish
38/42 Slingerland RK 14x6'5 Sparkling Green.
1936 Leedy Broadway Standard 14x5 WMP
Old Zildjian K's
Posted on 8 years ago
#13
Loading...

Thanks for the confirmation on the 12 stamp. The 13 is definitely old stamp...

Posted on 8 years ago
#14
Guest
Loading...

I'm not an expert on these different old stamps, but I do have Rob Cook's The Ludwig Book, which includes Bill Hartrick's latest publication on these (2013). If we are lucky Bill (Drumaholic) might answer himself, and I was hanging back hoping he would. It's his research, of course.

But in the meantime, I'd say there are only 3 possible trademarks for your 13": Type IIb, IIIa, and IIIb. The trouble is that your picture isn't the best, and what I can see remains uncertain. Here is an annotated pic so you know what I'm discussing.

[img]http://black.net.nz/cym2015/old-stamp-k-unsure.jpg[/img]

According to my reading of Bill's words, the position of the large K which lines up with the top of ZILDJIAN suggests Type IIb (1949-1950). But then the lower ZILDJIAN at an angle suggests Type IIIa (1950-1953). However, these differences aren't always present. Both of these characteristics vary a bit according to Bill. And since they seem to suggest different things it would be nice to find a decider.

One of the deciding attributes seems to be whether the star is large enough to touch the crescent moon (IIb) or whether the star is a little smaller so it doesn't touch (IIIa and IIIb). But I can't see the star and crescent moon well enough in your photo to say whether it touches or not. I'm not thinking that Type IIIb is likely because Bill says that in the IIIb the horizontal stamping of the word ZILDJIAN plus a slightly larger letter height for the ZILDJIAN are the two most reliable identifying features. Note that Bill doesn't explicitly say it is the lower ZILDJIAN he is talking about, but I presume it is because that interpretation fits what I see in the picture. Note also that Bill's discussion of the distinguishing features of the Type IIb is the longest description of any of the stamps, and that's for good reason. These are subtle differences and hard to pick.

Hope this helps.

Posted on 8 years ago
#15
Loading...

Thanks so much zenstat, very much appreciated! Attached is a better photo of the stamp - the "K" appears to line up with "Zildjian", and the lower "Zildjian" is also at an angle. I don't think that the star is touching the crescent, so most likely a IIIb I would have thought, but please do chime in if you think differently! Your (and all others') expertise really is valued...

1 attachments
Posted on 8 years ago
#16
  • Share
  • Report
Action Another action Something else here