For me, the greater question is whether or not that extra resonance and sustain is needed or wanted.
Now there's an important question! I find all these discussions regarding resonance somewhat amusing, as they are usually based on the presumption that more resonance is somehow "better". Who says? Modern drum technologies (shell construction, hardware, bearing edge profiles) seem to be preoccupied with this presumption that we all want our drums to ring like church bells. Drum companies have convinced us that we need suspension mounts and free-floating FT feet to maximize resonance. If maximizing resonance is important to you, why bother playing vintage drums, drums designed with rounded bearing edges, calfskin heads, and built-in tone controls designed to suppress resonance? If maximum resonance is what you're after, buy a set of modern DW's or better yet, recut all the bearing edges on your Slingerlands, Ludwigs, Camcos, and Rogers to a nice sharp, 45 degree edge until they ring like timpani and have lost all their vintage sound.
And to you hard-core resonance hunters, sure you may notice the slight increase in resonance when you use those expensive suspension mounts, but you're hearing that slight difference two feet away from the drum in a quiet room! We are all guilty of judging the sound (resonance, tuning, tone) of our drums from two feet behind them, when we should be evaluating the sound our drums thirty feet in front of them as the audience hears them. Try to convince me you can discern an audible difference in a drummer's tom mounts from thirty feet in front of a band with music playing.
Soap Box Ah, that rant felt good,
Mike