Lennon has ragged on Pete Best's playing ability during recorded interviews (spending all that time performing in Germany only to come back barely able to move his arms up & down at four to the beat... or something to that effect). So, if there was any replacing it would be Pete and not Ringo. Ringo could swing his ass off and had incredible time - PERIOD.
Did they fly Purdie over to England for any of this overdubbing?
Was not a single high echelon British studio musician up to the task of dubbing material?
Seems rather expensive to send masters overseas tto N.Y. (Purdie was now based in N.Y around the early '60's), hire a producer and Purdie the session man, send the tapes back... etc. I just don't see the value there with notoriously cheap record producers/companies footing the bills.
I'm curious if he just got his Sgt. Peppers Lonely Heart Club Band soundtrack credits mixed up with the Beatles catalog.
EDIT: Oh yea, on other thing... How common was overdubbing in that era? I think it was rather difficult as multi-tracking that we know today wasn't that common until the mid-'60's. The three-track recorder was fairly popular, but I think it would have been extremely difficult to just go for some drum over dubs with that technology as it would have wiped out other recorded content and that I think a producer would have just said at the time of the original recording let's do another take (rather than going through the process of hiring a guy to overdub).