Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
Processing Attachment, Gallery - 133.46973%

Vintage Zildjian Identification help

Loading...

I recently got this 14" Zildjian cymbal. It weighs 925 grams. Any ideas on the dating? thanks

1 attachments
Posted on 6 years ago
#1
Guest
Loading...

That has the quirks of the taller version (1.5") of the 1960s trademark stamp.

[img]http://black.net.nz/avedis/images/22-3482-later60s-ruler.jpg[/img]

Bill Hartrick (Drumaholic) who originally documented it said it was "later 1960s" vs "early 60s" for the shorter version. I don't know how many examples of short vs tall 60s tademarked cymbals he had accurate dates for. I haven't been able to replicate his claim by correlating lathing or hammering differences between cymbals with the taller or shorter 60s stamp. We don't have accurate years for first use in factory and last use in factory for either version of the 60s stamp. So for now I just talk about 60s.

Posted on 6 years ago
#2
Loading...

From zenstat

That has the quirks of the taller version (1.5") of the 1960s trademark stamp. [img]http://black.net.nz/avedis/images/22-3482-later60s-ruler.jpg[/img]Bill Hartrick (Drumaholic) who originally documented it said it was "later 1960s" vs "early 60s" for the shorter version. I don't know how many examples of short vs tall 60s tademarked cymbals he had accurate dates for. I haven't been able to replicate his claim by correlating lathing or hammering differences between cymbals with the taller or shorter 60s stamp. We don't have accurate years for first use in factory and last use in factory for either version of the 60s stamp. So for now I just talk about 60s.

Cool...I knew you would have the info I needed. 60's works for me :)

Posted on 6 years ago
#3
  • Share
  • Report
Action Another action Something else here