I just read through this whole thread for the first time.
mcjnic, I'll go against the grain here, and agree with you in some respects.
The "most recorded snare" thing gets annoying as a sales pitch. Kind of like seeing Bonham and Ringo's names associated with everything, it just gets old. It makes you want to use anything else, just to be unique!
One of the main reasons cited for the Supra being the most recorded drum is Hal Blaine's EXTENSIVE, and I do mean extensive, list of recordings. What people fail to realize is that while Hal did often use Supras throughout his long career, he also often used the chrome over brass snare that came with his '62 Blue Sparkle set...this drum was a Super, not a Supra. A lot of those Hal Blaine 60's hits were done on a brass snare drum...different sound and feel.
I think part of the reason the Supra was so popular with recording engineers was not so much its ability to sound good, but rather its inability to sound bad. A good snare drum sound is a good snare drum sound...most people cannot tell them apart in a blindfold test. However, most snare drums are somewhat of a challenge to get sounding good, but a Supraphonic or Acrolite will often sound good no matter what...beat heads, out of tune, etc, and they still get "that" sound.
But I'm with you, I wouldn't mind if I never heard or read "most recorded snare drum" ever again!