I just couldn't resist commenting on this thread. First of all:Fayray, those look great! You did a good detail job! Secondly,dharma bum, yours look like they were actually "Pearl" branded, and not just because of the logo on the BD. The tom holder is exactly what Pearl used in the early-to-mid-70s, and your BD T-handles are Pearl as well. The spacing of the Ts/claws suggests a 20-lug BD as opposed to the 16 lugs on the Maxwin.Fayray was right in his original post about Maxwin being an entry-level set. Pearl made a LOT of different brands in that era (but maybe not as many different as in the 60s!). Yes, the wrap and the lugs would/could be the same; but then the number of lugs, style of spurs, holders, Ts, claws, etc. would be usually noticably (sp?) "cheaper." Usually the contruction of the shells as well, as Pearl offered fiberglass and wood-fiberglass on their top-of-the-line stuff and a 9-ply wood shell (same as the wood-FG, but without the FG) on their cheaper lines.Just wondering... dharma bum, are yours FG or wood-FG?Bill
Hi Bill, I was thinking the same thing - Dharma bum's kit looks like a real Pearl. That said the Maxwin kit has the feel of an early 70s Japanese Pearl kit of which I've restored a few. Many of the parts are the same but without the "Japan" stamp on the mounts etc (tom mounts, FT leg mounts etc). To be fair, I was expecting to find a big step down in quality of parts and build over the Japanese Pearls but that's not the case. There is a small step down but it would be a very useable kit. The Maxwin was the precurser to the Export line. Here's a really good piece from the Mike Dolbear site: http://mikedolbear.com/story.asp?StoryID=2659&Source=Search&txtSearch=Sat