Search
Register
Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
Processing Attachment, Gallery - 132.66806%

Two 22" old stamp K's...a poll

Posts: 2374 Threads: 168

I'd like to run a poll to find out which of these 2 old stamp K's you prefer. Both are 22's, and both are exactly the same trademark vintage. The only difference is that first one weighs 2348g and the second weighs 2591g.

[color=black][font=times new roman][size=+1]Click on these links:[/size][/font][/color]

[color=black][font=times new roman][size=+1]22" Istanbuk K type IIIa OS #1[/size][/font][/color]

[color=black][font=times new roman][size=+1]22" Istanbuk K type IIIa OS #2[/size][/font][/color]

[color=black][font=times new roman][size=+1]Vote for which one you like best, and why you prefer your choice.[/size][/font][/color]

Posted on 12 years ago
#1
Posts: 45 Threads: 17

I personally prefer the second one, I really like the sound of it. In comparison to the other, I the wash seems to be lower and the stick definition really pops. Just my opinion! Also, What's the latin beat being played in the beginning of the second recording?

Thanks,

Ron

Posted on 12 years ago
#2
Posts: 35 Threads: 3

From Drumaholic

I'd like to run a poll to find out which of these 2 old stamp K's you prefer. Both are 22's, and both are exactly the same trademark vintage. The only difference is that first one weighs 2348g and the second weighs 2591g.[color=black][font=times new roman][size=+1]Click on these links:[/size][/font][/color][color=black][font=times new roman][size=+1]22" Istanbuk K type IIIa OS #1[/size][/font][/color][color=black][font=times new roman][size=+1]22" Istanbuk K type IIIa OS #2[/size][/font][/color][color=black][font=times new roman][size=+1]Vote for which one you like best, and why you prefer your choice.[/size][/font][/color]

Cymbal choices are subjective. I can't explain why, but I like the first one. It just sounds better to me.

Tan

Posted on 12 years ago
#3
Posts: 2374 Threads: 168

From Liatnor

I personally prefer the second one, I really like the sound of it. In comparison to the other, I the wash seems to be lower and the stick definition really pops. Just my opinion! Also, What's the latin beat being played in the beginning of the second recording?Thanks,Ron

Vote much?

Posted on 12 years ago
#4
Posts: 24 Threads: 14

I prefer K #1 (2300 grams). A little too much wash on K #2. Both are fantastic, though. It's really a case of splitting hairs.

Posted on 12 years ago
#5
Posts: 144 Threads: 16

My vote is for #2. The stick sound is outstanding on both cymbals but I prefer the more distinct bell sound of #2. Both beautiful sounding cymbals, though.

Posted on 12 years ago
#6
Posts: 6524 Threads: 37

I voted K#2, although # 1 is by far a better sounding cymbal, it would get all messed up by my hard hit`n rock. #1 just wont do for Rock !!

It`s a drum,.....Hit It !!

.....76/#XK9207 Phonic Sound Machine D454/D-505 snares !i
Posted on 12 years ago
#7
Posts: 1918 Threads: 60

I really didn't like either. They both lacked in areas.

1 had a nice brightness but was a bit thick sounding. It held it's clang just under the wash and never opened up wide enough.

2 was just too stiff and dark. It was somewhat one dimensional and couldn't reach into the upper registers. It hid the stick.

I know these must be sweet cymbals but we are a subjective and opinionated animal. They just didn't do it for me.

What Would You Do
Posted on 12 years ago
#8
Posts: 1296 Threads: 208

#1 gets my vote.

What stick did you use for the recording?

I also voted in my state's primary today...Soap Box

Never play it the same way once.
Posted on 12 years ago
#9
Posts: 2374 Threads: 168

From orangemi

#1 gets my vote. What stick did you use for the recording?I also voted in my state's primary today...Soap Box

I didn't make that #1 recording so I don't know.

Posted on 12 years ago
#10
  • Share
  • Report
Action Another action
Something else here